The Scenic Hudson Collection consists of materials documenting the landmark environmental law case that opposed the Consolidated Edison Company’s proposed pump storage facility at Storm King Mountain, near Cornwall, NY. The Scenic Hudson Decision, as the case is called in law books, launched the modern environmental movement.
The collection consists of transcripts of hearings from March 9, 1977 to December 12, 1980. These hearing are titled, EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. This case was brought before Judge Thomas B. Yost. Present for the hearings were Henry Gluckstern, Attorney for EPA, Region II, Jonathan Strong, Attorney for EPA, E.J. Sack Attorney for Con Edison as well as many others. The hearings concluded on December 12, 1980 where Con Edison agreed to drop the plan for the Storm King facility.
The Hudson River Fisheries Unit donated the collection to the Marist College Library in 2008.
In September 1962, the Consolidated Edison Company announced plans to build a pumped storage facility, the largest of its kind in the world, at Storm King Mountain near Cornwall, New York. The initial application for license to construct the plant was filed with the Federal Power Commission in January 1963. On November 8, 1963, a small group of concerned citizens met at the home of Carl Carmer and formed the Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference to fight the pumped storage project on the grounds that it posed a threat to the Cornwall water supply and Hudson River fisheries as well as to scenic and historic Storm King Mountain.
Carl Carmer, author of The Hudson River and other historic works, became honorary chairman and Leo O. Rothchild was named chairman. Rothchild served until 1968 and was succeeded by Alexander Saunders. Initially, the members, working in their own homes or borrowed office space, contacted friends, prominent citizens, politicians, and other organizations for financial support, letter writing campaigns, and legal intervention. The organizations grew rapidly. Contributions were channeled through the Natural Area Council until Scenic Hudson was incorporated in 1974. Rod Vandivert became the executive director in the mid-1960s. An office was set up in New York City, but the location changed several times during Storm King case and there were a number of office managers during that period. Professional fundraisers and public relations firms were employed in later years.
Aided by other organizations and individuals, the group conducted an intensive campaign to educate the public and to deter Consolidated Edison by legal means. The records, which document the organization’s activities, include publicity materials, copies of legal documents submitted by Scenic Hudson and others, and transcripts of hearings before Congressional sub-committees and the Federal Power Commission. The case lasted for 17 years. In a negotiated settlement in December 1980, Consolidated Edison agreed to drop the plan for the Storm King facility.
The lengthy and controversial case set important precedents in environmental law and is generally credited with spawning the modern environmental movement. Scenic Hudson, Inc. continues to serve as an environmental watchdog in the Hudson Valley.
No Restrictions
Individuals requesting reproductions expressly assume the responsibility for compliance with all pertinent provisions of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. ss101 et seq. Patrons further agree to indemnify and hold harmless the Marist College Archives Special Collections and its staff in connection with any disputes arising from the Copyright Act, over the reproduction of material at the request of patrons. For more information please visit the following website:
This case was brought before Judge Thomas B. Yost. Present for the hearings were Henry Gluckstern, Attorney for EPA, Region II, Jonathan Strong, Attorney for EPA, E.J. Sack Attorney for Con Edison as well as many others. The hearings all took place in New York City, with the majority of them being held at the World Trade Center.
Chronological
This folder includes evidence that was used during the hearings. There is a letter to Mr. Mark concerning the First Set of Interrogatories Respecting EPA Exhibit 218 Appendix 1 from Jonathan Strong, and a letter to Judge Yost concerning Submittal of Errata with Respect to Exhibit EPA – 200.
Chronological